Warrant Issued After Woman Found Slain From Gunshot Wounds in Branson Hotel

Thomas Phillip Brown - Wanted for Murder
BRANSON, Mo. -An arrest warrant has been issued for  68-year-old Thomas Phillip Brown after his wife was found dead from bullet wounds inflicted in room 182 of the  Ramada Resort and Conference center on Branson's 76 Strip.

The probable cause statement used to issue the arrest warrant revealed  Marilyn Brown, Thomas Brown's wife checked into the hotel room as temporary shelter on Feb. 21, 2013 after being displaced from their residence.

The Brown's recently relocated from  Palm Springs, Calif. and according to one family member against Thomas Brown's will. A hotel housekeeper  found Marilyn Brown on Feb., 24 2013. Digital keys log no other entry to the room except for Thomas Brown's keycard..

Thomas Brown is "known to carry a firearm" and has worked as a security guard in the past. He is likely to be traveling with the family dog in a  blue Dodge Durango California License Plate # 5WR-F678.

 *The probable cause statement also indicates there were no signs of struggle at the crime scene.

FULL PROBABLE CAUSE STATEMENT UNEDITED BELOW:

Doug Coverdell Vs. Empire District Electric (Current North Beach Park Photos and Litigation Summary)






Coverdell's Landing aka North Beach Park is a mecca rich with old growth trees and honey holes ripe enough for even the average trout fisherman to reach his limit.  At one time the park was slated for construction but court records show Branson testified to not owning the property halting bulldozers leveling everything surrounding the peninsula including a liberty tree.

The City of Branson is throwing "Hail Mary's" begging multiple courts with conflicting stories to grant a verdict favoring Empire District Electric in disregard to a 1970 Warranty Deed claiming 35% of the property known as the Branson Landing.

At the helm Branson has hired outside counsel, one of a dozen firms hired since current Mayor Raeanne Presley started a multi-million dollar deficit  spending spree that has lasted since taking office. Presley was involved in litigation with the city before competition was disqualified leaving her the sole choice on an election ballot. And while Presley is the first mayor in Branson's history to run a negative annual balance, the process is fascinating to watch in the courtroom. In fact, since the Mayor's arch enemy Andy Williams passed -, the Taney County Courthouse is the best show in the Branson area. It also happens to the most pricey.

While Branson doesn't claim to own the land; the implications of fact put the municipality extensively exposed.When the city set out to build on the Lake Taneycomo waterfront they offered numerous property owners quick claim deeds, they neglected a large chunk due to shoddy research. When legal counsel for the city became aware of the mistake in the early 90's they developed a leasing strategy in collboration with Empire District Electric. While appearing enemies in court they were negotiating the system to corner Coverdell out of title ownership. A strategy of perpetual litigation blocked Coverdell from possessing the land the warranty deed said he owned until a jury was able to review the case.

When a Taney County jury upheld Coverdell's claim of ownership the city responded with a new team of counsel. Due to the incestuous political and attorney relationships there has been plenty of help.  The attorneys seem to rotate to different parties - banks, utility companies, political entities reaching their hands from different perspectives. While the attorney's clients change the claim of ownership for the same piece of land remains concistent. At one hearing no less than eight attorneys stood against Coverdell; a strategy Coverdell didn't seem to mind as it would have played well to most juries. But the money flows everywhere but to a settlement once offered for pennies on the dollar.

While calamity for the city seemed certain, former Supreme Court Judge John Holstein entered the case on behalf of the city of Branson. Holstein argued to the Missouri Southern District Branson's ignorrance to Coverdell's title and the opposite in Federal Court. In order to sue for millions in title insurance damage not only did Holstein claim knowledge to Coverdell's title in the early 90's but submitted Branson's legal correspondence detailing both knowledge and strategy.

It is Holstein that has proved to be the most interesting component of the case. During arguments he's ruthless, not with his knowledge of the law but rather audacity to forward arguments - arguments other counsel wouldn't dare submit. Holstein, who is the father-in-law of the Branson City Attorney who negotiated the Branson Landing, Paul Link, claims to bill $750.00 hourly standard and further claims to be charging the city a discounted $350.00 per hour for charitable purposes.

While the City of Branson claims Sunshine Requests made verbally in open meetings do not have to be answered as statute demands, court records affirm Holstein's billing rate statements are true. Local court customs are foreign to Holstein.  Local attorney's grant time liberally as common courtesy preventing defaults before the court can hear their clients cause. Contrarily, Holstein is ruthless in pursuit of his clients interests. During a simple entry motion last month the city was billed in excess of $10k for an entry motion to dismiss Coverdell's case. Generally these types of motions are quickly tossed by the judiciary. And while the threat of sanctions hoovers before the Federal Court (Holstein is demanding all legal correspondence) sanctions are threatened against several title companies.

Holstein's strategy is effective twofold. On one hand the sheer cost of defending against an entity with little regard for fiscal sanity should have overwhelmed Coverdell, In addition Holstein has charisma and is highly respected inciting judges at times to overlook both fact and statute. The judicial seems to overlook even the most common procedures. During oral arguments to the Missouri Southern District Court of Appeals, Holstein presented maps which weren't presented in trial and claimed Coverdell's victory would encumber infracstructure created 30 years after the warranty deed being disputed was issued. If it weren't for Coverdell's counselor Robert W. Cockerham, the case would surely be lost. Cokerham and Holstein seem to be a fair match in recent hearings. Holstein's clout is matched by Cockerham's ability to recount hundreds of details instantaneously and in one hearing backed each statement with caselaw citing Holstein's rulings. If Holstein is ultimately victorious he will have to counter many of his own rulings in trial.

But victory for Branson is bittersweet. An arrogant attitude has cost the town of 10,000 citizens millions in the courtroom. The absent press has complicated the matter relying on statements from Branson counsel. The only victory thus far for Branson is on the Public Relations front. The mayor's media relationships, including equity in the corporations broadcasting information about the case has quelled detail successfully.

The other winners are the heirs of the Plaster Empire. Before passing Robert Plaster was well known. In the 1970's the US Justice Department accused him of unfair business practices to gain a monopoly in the propane industry including threatening competitors. The Justice Department filed charges again after a 1970's accusing him of hiring two men to blow up a competitor's gas tank with a 10 stick dynamite bomb. F. Lee Bailey earned Plaster an aquittal after a three week trial paving the way for one of the largest propane companies in the United States.

In the 1990's plaster was known for his charitable donations and locally for an attempt to bring gambling to the Branson area through a project in Stone County he'd hoped could be designated as a Native American reserve.

According to sources with equity in the Branson Landing project, the Plaster family has increased their holding in the Branson Landing.

Media Note:
While dozens of hearings have been scheduled the court hasn't determined whether cameras will be allowed inside or not. Branson's mayor has a partnership with Schurz through which all media requests for cameras in  the Taney County Courts have to be submitted. And while the case isn't being followed locally national interest is rising commanding facts relating to the case will have increased public awareness.






Documents published by City of Branson Contradict Testimony to Appellate - Tax Scheme , Adverse Possession Strategy Outlined


Documents filed in Federal Court last month establish that the City of Branson was not only aware of ownership issues but also negotiated with former Judge Peter Rea to clear title on 37% of the $450 million public/private Lake Taneycomo development known as the Branson Landing.

Contrary to testimony presented to the Missouri Southern District Court of Appeals; correspondence from former Branson attorney Lynn Rogers reveals Branson Alderman agreed to settle the dispute with Rea as long as the purchase price was laundered through a third party.

Rea invented a scheme where much of the land described in a warranty deed filed in 1972 by Tori Inc., a company owned by Rea, would be donated to the City of Branson in addition to $25,000 - $30,000 cash. Rea's donation of land would include a tax credit for $8 million dollars with Rea would market to another business entity for an additional $1 million dollars in cash. The document dated July 6th 2004 (posted above)details Branson's strategy and shortcomings summed with the statement from Branson's legal counsel:
"The chain of title in -this case is an absolute mess.' There appears to be nothing but gaps based upon the deeds presented"

Branson's Alderman met with attorneys from Empire District Electric whom filed a quite title lawsuit to clarify ownership.

While Branson was working hand-in-hand with Empire District Electric, they planned a maneuver to finagle the land from Empire's hands through adverse possession. The legitimacy of a title of which the city of Branson payed $940,000 was also in question. The $940,000 land purchase helped legitimize Rea's claim.
While Branson made a strategic decision to not litigate the matter, gambling on Empire District Electric victory was a costly error. A Taney County jury ruled in favor of Coverdell solidifying Coverdell's property claim. The Missouri Southern District Court of Appeals heard testimony from former Missouri Supreme Court Judge John Holstein who claimed the City of Branson was unaware of the implications of the Taney county jury's verdict in favor of Coverdell.

The basis for Empire District Electric's lawsuit was a "scrivner's error" made 100 years ago. Branson's counsel opines the lack of validity to Empire's claims. Holstein not only denied knowledge, but submitted maps created 9 years after the quite title lawsuit was filed. While the lawsuit predates the creation of the Branson Landing by over 4 years; Holstein argued Coverdell's victory would cause insurmountable damage to the City.

Empire District Electric clearly had ulterior motive in filing the lawsuit. Victory could mean billions in property losses from Taney County landowners. Empire District Electric hopes two Missouri Supreme Court decisions will be overturned that translates "flooding rights" be interpreted as fee simple tile.

Empire District Electric has backed off a policy of notifying property owners on Lake Taneycomo their claims against owners of property on lake since Coverdell's victory.

The document posted above was an exhibit filed in U.S Federal Court by the City of Branson against First American Title Insurance, Chicago Title Insurance Company and Fidelity National Title Insurance Company.

Over the past few years the City of Branson has taken a conservative position on releasing public documents denying access to invoices paid in clear violation of Missouri's Sunshine Law. Local news outlets have been unable to obtain the billing documents; however, it is believed that billing may ex-cede $1,000,000 for Holstein's "cloud making" services. The City of Branson hopes to recover funds through a title policy whose terms are in dispute.

In order to bypass legal controversy over property ownership, the City of Branson worked with Empire District electric creating a new plat map overlaying the property ownership in question. 

City of Branson Intervenes in Branson Landing Title Case - Moves Forward in Federal Court

Branson Landing developer HCW Development companies lawsuit against Tri-lakes Title and the company's predecessor were intercepted with the City of Branson moving litigation to a Federal Court. The City of Branson motioned to intervene citing litigation pending in the U.S. District Court Western District of Missouri in Springfield.

Documents which will be posted before the weekend on http://bransonedge.com paint a damming portrait of the City of Branson's legal activity, collaboration to commit fraud, acknowledgement of title defects and an intimate understanding to minute details involving complications and shortcomings with the Branson Landing project in direct contradiction to statements made by the City of Branson to the press.

Branson's mayor currently has a fiscal relationship (business partnership)  with the parent company of two local television stations KSPR and KY3 inc. Neither station has reported on the collaborative efforts of Branson, Empire District Electric and HCW to conceal facts regarding litigation in progress during the issuance of  Branson Landing 2005A bonds. In fact the opposite is true. Official documents created to entice investors erroneously claim 37% of the Branson Landing was in litigation at the time the bonds were being offered; In fact, the documents have statements from all three entities denying such encumbrances to fee simple title exist. The misrepresentation's of fact are promoted through the document published below.

The false statement that Branson was not involved in litigation at the time, contrary to fact is highlighted on page 33.

Official Statement 2005
Insurance Dispute
Branson claims to be the recipient of a title insurance policy which may not exist.

In fact, evidence suggests money coughed up by the City of Branson and HCW Development collectively to insure investors in the Branson Landing were protected might not have been utilized to purchase title insurance. The issue may ulitmately be decided by the court.

Documents which will be posted soon elaborate on a very shady relationship between the City of Branson and disbarred judge Peter Rea. Rea who was disbarred for sexual misconduct has a son-in-law that serves as an executive for HCW. Former Missouri Supreme Court Judge John Holstein is being retained by the city of Branson at a half price rate ($325 per hour) to defend the city of Branson's interests through post trial activity. Holstein's former law clerk was lead counsel during the time a plan was concocted to obtain property not available through direct chain of title.  Holstein's son-in-law Paul Link served as Chief Counsel for the city of Branson through much of the negotiations and completion of the lakefront project.

Circumstances suggest Holstein's generosity may result from corrective measures ensuring the safety of both former employee and relative. Such courtesy is not granted to other attorneys working on the case.

James Meadows, Jennifer R. Growcock and Jay M. Dade are listed as Branson's counsel for their case against Fidelity Title Insurance Company.

Documents produced by the trio elaborate on negotiations with Peter Rea (among other elements) and the City of Branson.

Criminal Activity Alleged in Branson Landing Title Insurance Dispute

Court filings submitted by HCW Development relating to Branson's $450 million riverfront project, popularly known as the Branson Landing, allege damages occurred due to Doug Coverdell's trial victory granting "37.34%" of the Branson Landing to Coverdell and affiliated companies.

The accusations posed by HCW Development Company LLC are serious claiming negligence, misrepresentation and/or fraud reached the standard of "Tort".

HCW Development is seeking damages  for 1. Vexation Refusal 2. Breach of Contract and 3. Negligent Misrepresentation. HCW is seeking a minimum of $25,000 for each charge setting a floor of $75,000 which could elevate to millions as damages outlined in the court petition are calculated.

Empire District Electric, The City of Branson and HCW Development  claimed the Branson Landing wasn't involved in litigation as they were seeking a third round of funding. The image posted to the left (click to enlarge) is taken from page 33 of the official statement asking investors for $18,560,000.

While the City of Branson and Empire District Electric claim ignorance to litigation - they were not only aware but in the case of Empire were mutual aggressors seeking quiet title action to secure the first round of funding.

(Developing)

Taney County Election Results 2012 - (Final)



Taney County, Missouri
GENERAL ELECTION
Summary For Jurisdiction Wide, All Counters, All Races
Unofficial Results
11/6/2012

11/06/12
21:34:25

Reported Precincts

Absentee
Boston Center
Bradleyville
Branson 1
Branson 2
Branson 3
Cedar Creek
Forsyth 1
Forsyth 2
Hollister 1
Hollister 2
Hollister 3
Kirbyville
Kissee Mills
Merriam Woods
Mt Branson
North Branson
Mark Twain
Rockaway Beach
Skyline
Taneyville
Walnut Shade


Registered Voters 31393 - Cards Cast 21778 69.37%Num. Report Precinct 22 - Num. Reporting 22 100.00%

PRESIDENT/VICE PRESIDENT



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21778/31393 69.4 %
Total Votes
21687

OBAMA/BIDEN DEM 5462 25.19%
ROMNEY/RYAN REP 15713 72.45%
JOHNSON/GRAY LIB 348 1.60%
GOODE/CLYMER CST 85 0.39%
Write-in Votes
79 0.36%

U.S. SENATOR



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
21281

CLAIRE McCASKILL DEM 7812 36.71%
TODD AKIN REP 11915 55.99%
JONATHAN DINE LIB 1518 7.13%
Write-in Votes
36 0.17%

GOVERNOR



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
21388

JEREMIAH W. NIXON DEM 8053 37.65%
DAVID (DAVE) SPENCE REP 12731 59.52%
JIM HIGGINS LIB 593 2.77%
Write-in Votes
11 0.05%

LIEUTENANT GOVERNOR



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
21064

SUSAN MONTEE DEM 5964 28.31%
PETER KINDER REP 13970 66.32%
MATTHEW COPPLE LIB 585 2.78%
CYNTHIA L. DAVIS CST 532 2.53%
Write-in Votes
13 0.06%

SECRETARY OF STATE



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
20976

JASON KANDER DEM 5749 27.41%
SHANE SCHOELLER REP 14337 68.35%
CISSE W. SPRAGINS LIB 582 2.77%
JUSTIN HARTER CST 295 1.41%
Write-in Votes
13 0.06%

STATE TREASURER



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
20730

CLINT ZWEIFEL DEM 6084 29.35%
COLE McNARY REP 13620 65.70%
SEAN O'TOOLE LIB 1016 4.90%
Write-in Votes
10 0.05%

ATTORNEY GENERAL



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
20966

CHRIS KOSTER DEM 7939 37.87%
ED MARTIN REP 12198 58.18%
DAVE BROWNING LIB 824 3.93%
Write-in Votes
5 0.02%

U.S. REP DIST 7



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
20982

JIM EVANS DEM 5186 24.72%
BILLY LONG REP 14807 70.57%
KEVIN CRAIG LIB 974 4.64%
Write-in Votes
15 0.07%

STATE SENATE DIST 29



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18350

DAVID SATER REP 18167 99.00%
Write-in Votes
183 1.00%

STATE REP DIST 138



Total
Number of Precincts
2
Precincts Reporting
2 100.0 %
Times Counted
665/837 79.5 %
Total Votes
557

DON PHILLIPS REP 556 99.82%
Write-in Votes
1 0.18%

STATE REP DIST 155



Total
Number of Precincts
10
Precincts Reporting
10 100.0 %
Times Counted
5905/8440 70.0 %
Total Votes
4972

LYLE ROWLAND REP 4927 99.09%
Write-in Votes
45 0.91%

STATE REP DIST 156



Total
Number of Precincts
16
Precincts Reporting
16 100.0 %
Times Counted
15193/22116 68.7 %
Total Votes
13167

JEFF JUSTUS REP 13033 98.98%
Write-in Votes
134 1.02%

CIRCUIT JUDGE CIRCUIT 38



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18378

MARK ORR REP 18217 99.12%
Write-in Votes
161 0.88%

WESTERN COMMISSIONER - DIST 1



Total
Number of Precincts
12
Precincts Reporting
12 100.0 %
Times Counted
10925/15775 69.3 %
Total Votes
9279

BRANDON WILLIAMS REP 9199 99.14%
Write-in Votes
80 0.86%

EASTERN COMMISSIONER



Total
Number of Precincts
17
Precincts Reporting
17 100.0 %
Times Counted
10838/15618 69.4 %
Total Votes
10202

DANNY STRAHAN REP 6184 60.62%
PHIL BEVERS IND 2942 28.84%
STEVE MAXWELL IND 1062 10.41%
Write-in Votes
14 0.14%

SHERIFF



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18896

JIMMIE RUSSELL REP 18616 98.52%
Write-in Votes
280 1.48%

ASSESSOR



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18246

CHUCK PENNEL REP 17997 98.64%
Write-in Votes
249 1.36%

TREASURER



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18557

MELANIE SMITH REP 18436 99.35%
Write-in Votes
121 0.65%

PUBLIC ADMINISTRATOR



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18433

CAROL S. DAVIS REP 18318 99.38%
Write-in Votes
115 0.62%

CORONER



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18639

KEVIN TWEEDY REP 18532 99.43%
Write-in Votes
107 0.57%

JUDGE GEORGE W. DRAPER III



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18452

YES
12801 69.37%
NO
5651 30.63%

JUDGE WILLIAM FRANCIS



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21763/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
18366

YES
12954 70.53%
NO
5412 29.47%

CONSTITUTIONAL AMENDMENT 3



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
19822

YES
7267 36.66%
NO
12555 63.34%

PROPOSITION A



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
19704

YES
14832 75.27%
NO
4872 24.73%

PROPOSITION B



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
20948

YES
9147 43.67%
NO
11801 56.33%

PROPOSITION E



Total
Number of Precincts
22
Precincts Reporting
22 100.0 %
Times Counted
21770/31393 69.3 %
Total Votes
20200

YES
14897 73.75%
NO
5303 26.25%

Voter  Count By Taney County Precinct (3-4 PM)
Hollister 3  - 913 votes
Taneyville - 395 votes
Mt. Branson - 605 votes
Cedar Creek -  174 Votes
Forsyth 1(City Hall ) - 797 votes
Branson 3 (Methodist Church) 1185 votes
Walnut Shade -  833 votes
Branson 1 - 580 Votes
Kirbyville 506 votes
Rockaway Beach 190 Votes
Merriam Woods - 253 Votes
Forsyth 2 (First Baptist Church) 915
Skyline  - 370
Hollister Middle School -1080 votes